<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security trumps environment as Obama gives green light to US consumption of Alberta’s oil.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/</link>
	<description>Independent analysis of climate policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, June 26th 2009 - Part 3 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-3019</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, June 26th 2009 - Part 3 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-3019</guid>
		<description>[...] what could possibly go wrong, again?  Lefty heads popped all over America and Canada as President O spoke favorably of Alberta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what could possibly go wrong, again?  Lefty heads popped all over America and Canada as President O spoke favorably of Alberta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>Tom - CI&#039;m not quite sure where you&#039;re coming from there.

ddbleader 61 - I apologise for the mistake ( provinces not states) but there is a significant amount of discourse in the US on Canada&#039;s tar sands within the environmental and scientific movement and its far too much a simplification to say US recognises canada&#039;s right to its own resources - that somewhat misses the point of all climate negotiations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; CI&#8217;m not quite sure where you&#8217;re coming from there.</p>
<p>ddbleader 61 &#8211; I apologise for the mistake ( provinces not states) but there is a significant amount of discourse in the US on Canada&#8217;s tar sands within the environmental and scientific movement and its far too much a simplification to say US recognises canada&#8217;s right to its own resources &#8211; that somewhat misses the point of all climate negotiations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddbleader61</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>ddbleader61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>Er...Canada has provinces not states.  Not that much of the discourse in the U.S. about the tar sands recognizes Canada&#039;s sovereignty over its own resources anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er&#8230;Canada has provinces not states.  Not that much of the discourse in the U.S. about the tar sands recognizes Canada&#8217;s sovereignty over its own resources anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientists Ask For Higher CO2 Cuts at Copenhagen&#8217;s Spring &#124; Introducing Earth Saving Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientists Ask For Higher CO2 Cuts at Copenhagen&#8217;s Spring &#124; Introducing Earth Saving Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>[...] Climatico Â» Security trumps environment as Obama gives green light &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Climatico Â» Security trumps environment as Obama gives green light &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>Milan - I agree that the oil sands are inconsistent with any serious Climate Change target, its liuke the UK and Kingsnorth Power station. The real problem, as I highlighted in a previous post is that there is too much weath and concomitant geo-political power to be gained from developing tar sands that I imagine they will receive a large amount of political protection.

Presumably this could also have a knock on effect in international negotiations where other countries use Canada&#039;s oil sands as leverage for their own special opt-out.

Either the environment lobby will have to really push to change Canadian attitudes - and/or international pressure to move forward again, or the same groups will demand deeper cuts elsewhere to compensate.  Neither seems ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milan &#8211; I agree that the oil sands are inconsistent with any serious Climate Change target, its liuke the UK and Kingsnorth Power station. The real problem, as I highlighted in a previous post is that there is too much weath and concomitant geo-political power to be gained from developing tar sands that I imagine they will receive a large amount of political protection.</p>
<p>Presumably this could also have a knock on effect in international negotiations where other countries use Canada&#8217;s oil sands as leverage for their own special opt-out.</p>
<p>Either the environment lobby will have to really push to change Canadian attitudes &#8211; and/or international pressure to move forward again, or the same groups will demand deeper cuts elsewhere to compensate.  Neither seems ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom C.</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>i would like to see one AGW cite obe single solitary peer reviewed back engineered paper that proves AGW casued by co2. Answer; there is none, zip, zero, never has been. It&#039;s all a big lie. If you have it refernce it, show it, just do something rather than lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to see one AGW cite obe single solitary peer reviewed back engineered paper that proves AGW casued by co2. Answer; there is none, zip, zero, never has been. It&#8217;s all a big lie. If you have it refernce it, show it, just do something rather than lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry chance</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>The pipeline is under construction.  It started over 1 year ago.  With crude up, it is now more profitible for the canadian economy.  Our partner is one of our largest sourfces of oil and trading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pipeline is under construction.  It started over 1 year ago.  With crude up, it is now more profitible for the canadian economy.  Our partner is one of our largest sourfces of oil and trading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noaaprogrammer</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>noaaprogrammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>-- just think of it as man cleaning up a big Mother-nature oil spill.  True, it now goes from being a carbon footprint in the sand to one in the sky, but over time, the majority of it will end up in the ocean, gradually incrementing its pH by such a small amount over such a long period of time that the sea creatures will have plenty of time to evolve and adapt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211; just think of it as man cleaning up a big Mother-nature oil spill.  True, it now goes from being a carbon footprint in the sand to one in the sky, but over time, the majority of it will end up in the ocean, gradually incrementing its pH by such a small amount over such a long period of time that the sea creatures will have plenty of time to evolve and adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamont County Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some energy issues of interest and concern</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont County Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some energy issues of interest and concern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>[...] Jun 22, 2009  United States, Great Britain and Russia Climate Action In the News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jun 22, 2009  United States, Great Britain and Russia Climate Action In the News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/?p=3418#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>The oil sands are touted as a resource equivalent to a second Saudi Arabia. This is the last thing the world needs. There are only so many fossil fuels we can burn while still having a decent shot of avoiding catastrophic climate change. As a result, fossil fuels are an industry with no long-term future. This is indirectly demonstrated by the shamefully weak greenhouse gas mitigation targets adopted by Alberta. They know that even if CCS development progresses perfectly, it will not let them bring their emissions in line with what is sustainable.

More:

http://www.sindark.com/2008/09/26/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-release/

http://www.sindark.com/2009/01/23/the-fossil-fuel-industry-has-no-long-term-future/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oil sands are touted as a resource equivalent to a second Saudi Arabia. This is the last thing the world needs. There are only so many fossil fuels we can burn while still having a decent shot of avoiding catastrophic climate change. As a result, fossil fuels are an industry with no long-term future. This is indirectly demonstrated by the shamefully weak greenhouse gas mitigation targets adopted by Alberta. They know that even if CCS development progresses perfectly, it will not let them bring their emissions in line with what is sustainable.</p>
<p>More:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/2008/09/26/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-release/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sindark.com/2008/09/26/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-release/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/01/23/the-fossil-fuel-industry-has-no-long-term-future/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sindark.com/2009/01/23/the-fossil-fuel-industry-has-no-long-term-future/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/security-trumps-environment-as-obama-gives-green-light-to-us-consumption-of-alberta%e2%80%99s-oil/feed/ ) in 0.65535 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:47 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 8:47 pm UTC -->
