Road to Copenhagen…UK plans are revealed

Posted by Samia Robbins on July 06, 2009
Adaptation, Countries, EU, Mitigation, Summits, UK

December 2009 is the key date when global world leaders aim to agree a ‘Global’ climate change plan at the forthcoming UN Summit at Copenhagen.  UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Miliband, outline what they would like to see emerge from the December 2009 Copenhagen summit in replacement to the Kyoto Protocol, which is due to expire in 2012. 

In his recent speech, Gordon Brown revealed a ‘Road to Copenhagen’ document which was presented to Parliament, and sets out why a Copenhagen deal is so important, and for the first time, what deal the UK Government is pushing for; some aspects are outlined below:

Emissions Reduction: Commit to firm reductions in amount of greenhouse gases they emit at Copenhagen.  The European Union has already pledged that it will reduce emissions by 20% below 1990 levels by 2020, and by 30% if other countries commit to a similar level of action in a global agreement.

Adaptation: The UK wants a deal which gives developing countries the support they need to develop their own national plans to adapt to climate change. Other Adaptation actions could include better water conservation, new farming methods and plans to build new homes and businesses away from flood plains.

Tackling deforestation: The UK wants to see a deal which at least halves the rate at which we are cutting down tropical forests by 2020, with a complete end to global forest loss by 2030 at the latest.

New technologies: Carbon Capture and Storage to prevent emissions from fossil-fuelled power stations entering the atmosphere; Electric vehicles that produce lower emissions; Solar and other renewable power that produces cleaner energy; Energy efficient products for use in homes and business.

The UK plans for action are based on the UK Climate Projections a few weeks ago, that showed that Britain will also suffer if we do nothing to reduce global carbon emissions.  By the 2080’s temperatures could, under a high emissions scenario, be up to 12 degrees C warmer on the hottest summer days and sea levels could rise by 36 cm.  

Together with our EU partners we have already made a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20% below 1990 levels by 2020, with an offer to reduce emissions by 30% if an ambitious global deal is agreed. 

The talks will discuss the sectors in which the greatest reductions can be achieved.  This will also vary on a country by country basis, as the largest carbon emitting sectors will vary, and the impact on national strategies in preventing future growth which will almost certainly cause debate for some.

As part of a broader marketing campaign within the UK, Ed Milliband is the forefront of ‘Act on Copenhagen’ the official UK government website launched on 26th June, and designed for activities in the lead up to global climate change negotiations in Copenhagen.  In addition, thousands of pamphlets will be issued to schools, citizen’s advice centres and libraries explaining why a global deal is vital and giving 15 top tips on what each of us can do to cut our carbon footprint as part of the global effort.

Not everyone will hold the same view as the UK and therefore anticipate that a convincing argument will need to be pitched at some world leaders, and China is one of them.  In the face of a strong and ever growing, and prosperous economy, what actions will be taken to limit the growth of factories, air travel and industrialization?

Developing nations are emitting up to 50.3 per cent of world emissions, a study provided by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, therefore, Gordon Brown will play a leading role in not only to pledging to reduce emissions from all members, but in leading the securing of a global agreement on climate change – a role which many leaders may wish to take.  With Ed Milibands recent announcement for a UK coal consultation Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) demonstration, this may be the driving force for the UK to show that they are leading the Copenhagen debate, and not following it. 

Gordon Brown plans to meet with the President Obama administration at the September meeting of the G20 in Pittsburgh before presenting his plans, with the hope of a successful outcome at Copenhagen in December.

Related posts:

  1. What does a good Copenhagen deal look like?
  2. A bumpy road to Copenhagen for Rudd’s CPRS
  3. Brown urges the EU’s ambitions for a global deal in Copenhagen
  4. Bridging the road from Copenhagen to Cancun – can the Bonn Climate talks lay any firm foundations?
  5. From London to Bonn – will Mexico consolidate its climate change leadership position on the road to Copenhagen? (1)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Make a Donation

Like what you read? Climatico is a nonprofit organization and relies on donations from readers like you to continue to provide you with quality independent coverage. Help show your support and make a tax-deductible donation today.

Comments

  • Samia

    Hi, I just wanted to confirm that Road to Copenhagen document does reference the UKs intention to tackle deforestation (part 2 and page 8 in more detail). Based on the global PR of this document, and the fact that it has been emphasised in thousands of leaflets to the public, could the UK government afford to avoid discussions on this at Copenhagen politically? As most countires are made up of varying resources, thus reducing barbon emissions in one sector may be more beneficial than another, it will be interesting to see who will lead that specific debate – the country with the most Co2 or the one with most political / trade influence. I am keen to hear your thoughts – how did this work out in Poznan?

    July 07 2009
    CommentsLike

    • An interesting point here is the UK’s vagueness about using the UNFCCC Adaptation Framework. Poznán set up the adaptation fund board and yet the UK is making noises that suggest is would prefer a more bilateral model. As yet, I haven’t been able to think of a reason for this, apart from concerns about how the AFB will disburse monies.

      I shall be interested to see how this rhetoric develops.

      July 07 2009
      CommentsLike
      • ken

        I find it hard to believe that forests will be part of the discussion. Usually this is left out. Forests are purposely left out of national carbon emission calculations because many nations have no forests to speak of, while others have millions of square miles of it. If you start to include forests in Carbon computations, some countries come out in a position of being net consumers of carbon. Look at nations like Brazil and Russia with enormous forest resources. For example, Canada has over 1 million square miles of forests, but has a total population of less than that of California. When the carbon emissions are calculated and forests are included, Canada is a net consumer of Co2. Thus many nations would owe Canada billions in carbon credits annually. This will upset the carbon trding balance, so Canada has agreed to leave forests out of their carbon emissions equations. But for how long?
        Eventually the public will learn of this travesty and will demand that forests be included. This would not bode well for the stability of Carbon prices. So I would not be surprised if forests are left out of these discussions, at least for this round.

        July 06 2009
        CommentsLike